MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106715796 · doi:10.1115/pvp2007-26006

Nonlinear Aeroelasticity Modeling Using a Reduced Order Model Based on Proper Orthogonal Decomposition

2007· article· en· W2106715796 on OpenAlexaff
Zhengkun Feng, Azzeddine Soulaïmani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAeroelasticityTransonicComputational fluid dynamicsNonlinear systemModel order reductionProper orthogonal decompositionApplied mathematicsControl theory (sociology)AerodynamicsComputer scienceTurbulenceMechanicsMathematicsPhysicsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Investigations of nonlinear aeroelasticity of flexible structures subjected to unsteady transonic flows were carried out by means of an aeroelasticity model coupled with a reduced order CFD model based on POD (proper orthogonal decomposition) method. The reduced order model is a three-dimensional with moving fluid boundaries. The CFD model order was reduced from more than 150000 of the full order model to 200 of the reduced order model and Limit Oscillation Cycle (LCO) was observed. The dynamic responses of the system were simulated with the coupled model. Qualitatively, the numerical simulations on AGARD 445.6 from the nonlinear aeroelasticity model coupled with the reduced order CFD model agree with those from the model coupled with the full order CFD model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicModel Reduction and Neural NetworksFrench-language works237,207