Ethinyl Estradiol Treatment for Growth Limitation in Girls with Marfan's Syndrome—Experience from a Single Center
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Tall stature, a major characteristic of Marfan's syndrome, may be of concern to the family, particularly if the patient is a girl. Experience with treatment options-sex steroid or somatostatin analogue-for height reduction in girls is limited. We have evaluated our experience of estrogen treatment in girls with Marfan's syndrome attending the pediatric endocrine clinic in Glasgow between 1989 and 2005. DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective case note analysis combined with ascertainment of final/near final height, comparing outcome in treated and untreated girls. Cardiovascular health was assessed by examining aortic root diameter and blood pressure. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised four treated and five untreated girls, of whom three were sisters. Treatment was started in the four girls at chronological age 10.0 (2.1) years, mean (SD) height 155.0 (9.8) cm, and Tanner breast stage B1 in three and B2 in one. Ethinyl estradiol was administered in stepwise incremental regimens, starting at 10 microg/day and reaching 100 microg/day after 10 weeks in two girls and starting at 2 microg/day and reaching a maximum of 30-50 microg/day over a 2- to 3-year period in two girls. Mean +/- SD (range) final/near final height of the four treated girls was 174.3 (2.6) (170.6-176.6) cm compared with 183.0 (6.9) (171.5-190.3) cm in the five untreated girls. No deaths occurred in the treated group while one untreated girl died from presumed arrhythmia aged 18 years. Aortic root diameter increased with age, by mean (SD) 5.0 (2.1) and 5.8 (4.5) mm in treated and untreated groups, respectively, but with no between-group differences after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The estrogen doses used in this study are lower than in previous reports. The results, although unsuitable for statistical analysis due to small numbers, are encouraging with no adverse events being recorded. Future research should be multicenter in design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".