Systematic investigation of hierarchical phosphorylation by protein kinase CK2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although multiple phosphorylation sites are often clustered in substrates, the mechanism of phosphorylation within clusters has not been systematically investigated. Intriguingly, in addition to acidic residues, protein kinase CK2 can use phosphoserine residues as consensus determinants suggesting that CK2 may act in concert with other kinases. We used a peptide array approach to outline optimal consensus sequences for hierarchical phosphorylation by CK2, both in the context of processive, multisite phosphorylation, and in concert with a priming proline-directed kinase. Results suggest that hierarchical phosphorylation involving CK2 requires precise positioning of either multiple phosphodeterminant residues or specific combinations of canonical determinants and phosphodeterminants, and can be as enzymatically favorable as canonical CK2 phosphorylation. Over 1600 human proteins contain at least one CK2 hierarchical consensus motif, and ~20% of these motifs contain at least one reported in vivo phosphorylation site. These motifs occur non-randomly in the human proteome, with significant enrichment in proteins controlling specific cellular processes. Taken together, our results provide strong in vitro evidence that hierarchical phosphorylation may contribute to the regulation of crucial biological processes. In addition, the results suggest a mechanism by which CK2, a constitutively active kinase, can be a regulatory participant in cellular processes. BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Phosphorylation is a crucial regulatory mechanism governing cellular signal transduction pathways, and despite the large number of identified sites to date, most mechanistic studies remain focused on individual phosphorylation sites. This study is the first to systematically determine specific consensus sequences for hierarchical phosphorylation events. The results indicate that individual phosphorylation sites should not be studied in isolation, and that larger, multisite phosphorylation motifs may have profound impact on cellular signaling. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Protein dynamics in health and disease. Guest Editors: Pierre Thibault and Anne-Claude Gingras.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".