MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106782047 · doi:10.1038/nrn1808

International perspectives on engaging the public in neuroethics

2005· review· en· W2106782047 on OpenAlexafffund
Judy Illes, Colin Blakemore, Mats Hansson, Takao K. Hensch, Alan I. Leshner, Gladys E. Maestre, Pierre J. Magistretti, Rémi Quirion, Piergiorgio Strata

Bibliographic record

VenueNature reviews. Neuroscience · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and AddictionDouglas Mental Health University InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health Research
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeHealth CanadaUniversity of California, San FranciscoNational Institutes of HealthUniversidad del ZuliaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchDana Alliance for Brain InitiativesNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchGreenwall Foundation
KeywordsNeuroethicsField (mathematics)Engineering ethicsPublic interestScale (ratio)Political scienceNeurosciencePsychologyPublic relationsEngineeringLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.009
Scholarly communication0.0070.015
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0160.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.264
GPT teacher head0.475
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNature reviews. NeuroscienceSame topicNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical InnovationsFrench-language works237,207