MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Temperature Mediates Shifts in Individual Aggressiveness, Activity Level, and Social Behavior in a Spider

2011· article· en· W2106790516 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEthology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Behavior and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraitPopulationForagingSpiderPsychologyBiologyWolf spiderEcologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although in recent years behavioral syndromes have received a wealth of attention, how traits within syndromes respond to changing environments is not well resolved. Here, we test the effects of temperature on a suite of behavioral traits in the spider Anelosimus studiosus to determine (1) whether there are shifts in individuals’ social tendency, activity level, and foraging behavior in response to temperature, (2) if these traits shift are in the direction predicted by within-population axes of trait covariance, and (3) whether the effects of temperature differ among individuals. In previous work, we documented a behavioral syndrome in A. studiosus where increased tolerance of conspecifics is correlated with decreased activity level and aggressiveness toward prey. Furthermore, there are distinct among-population differences in behavior, where individuals from warm sites tend to be more aggressive and active than individuals from cold sites. Our data here reveal that at warmer temperatures A. studiosus exhibit diminished tolerance of conspecifics, increased activity levels, shorter latencies of attack, and increased tendencies to attack multiple prey items. Furthermore, we found that individual differences in behavior were consistent across temperature regimes for the majority of behavioral traits considered here: social tendency, activity level, and latency of attack. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that these behaviors are linked together by shared genetic underpinnings (e.g., metabolic differences) and shift non-independently in response to contemporary abiotic environment (i.e., temperature). Furthermore, our data suggest that temperature itself could be responsible for the among-population variation in social structure in A. studiosus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.296
Threshold uncertainty score0.192

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it