MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106791688 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2008.4649449

A method for physiological data transmission and archiving to support the service of critical care using DICOM and HL7

2008· article· en· W2106791688 on OpenAlexaff
Johan Eklund, Carolyn McGregor, Kathleen P. Smith

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech UniversityBell (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDICOMComputer scienceContext (archaeology)Service (business)Data scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An increasing amount of physiological monitoring data is displayed on medical devices around the world every day. By and large, much of this data is lost beyond hand written annotations. Opportunities exist to utilize this data for improved care of those patients within the NICU and for clinical research. The service oriented architecture paradigm offers a way of thinking of critical care through the provision of services of critical care provided by clinicians where patients may be located within or outside their intensive care unit. A major inhibitor to this becoming reality is the lack of a standard for the representation of physiological data as HL7, for example, does not include definitions for time series data. This research proposes a method to represent, transmit and archive physiological data using DICOM and HL7. To enable this, a DICOM file writer and viewer for the physiological time-series data is proposed to specifically enable the storage requirement for these data. This research is then tested within the context of Neonatal Intensive Care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.366
GPT teacher head0.493
Teacher spread0.127 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHealthcare Technology and Patient MonitoringFrench-language works237,207