Buoyancy-dominated displacement flows in near-horizontal channels: the viscous limit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider the viscous limit of a plane channel miscible displacement flow of two generalized Newtonian fluids when buoyancy is significant. The channel is inclined close to horizontal. A lubrication/thin-film approximation is used to simplify the governing equations and a semi-analytical solution is found for the flux functions. We show that there are no steady travelling wave solutions to the interface propagation equation. At short times the diffusive effects of the interface slope are dominant and there is a flow reversal, relative to the mean flow. We are able to find a short-time similarity solution governing this initial counter-current flow. At longer times the solution behaviour can be predicted from the associated hyperbolic problem (where diffusive effects are set to zero). Each solution consists of a number N ≥ 1 of steadily propagating fronts of differing speeds, joined together by segments of interface that are stretched between the fronts. Diffusive effects are always present in the propagating fronts. We explore the effects of viscosity ratio, inclinations and other rheological properties on the front height and front velocity. Depending on the competition of viscosity, buoyancy and other rheological effects, it is possible to have single or multiple fronts. More efficient displacements are generally obtained with a more viscous displacing fluid and modest improvements may also be gained with slight positive inclination in the direction of the density difference. Fluids that are considerably shear-thinning may be displaced at high efficiencies by more viscous fluids. Generally, a yield stress in the displacing fluid increases the displacement efficiency and yield stress in the displaced fluid decreases the displacement efficiency, eventually leading to completely static residual wall layers of displaced fluid. The maximal layer thickness of these static layers can be directly computed from a one-dimensional momentum balance and indicates the thickness of static layer found at long times.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".