MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Altered molecular response to adrenoreceptor-induced cardiac hypertrophy in Egr-1-deficient mice

2000· article· en· W2106817846 on OpenAlexaff
Nacéra Saadane, Lesley Alpert, Lorraine E. Chalifour

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyMuscle hypertrophyPhenylephrineChemistryFibrosisBETA (programming language)BiologyMedicineBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unmanipulated early growth response-1 (Egr-1)-deficient -/- mice have similar heart-to-body weight ratios but express lower amounts of atrial natriuretic factor (ANF), beta-myosin heavy chain (beta-MHC), skeletal actin, NGF1-A binding protein (NAB)-2, Sp1, c-fos, c-jun, GATA-4, and Nkx2.5 than +/+ or +/- mice. alpha-MHC, tubulin, and NAB-1 expression was similar. Isoproterenol (Iso) and phenylephrine (PE) infusion into +/+ and -/- mice increased heart weight, ANF, beta-MHC, skeletal actin, Sp1, NAB-2, c-fos, and c-jun expression, but induction in -/- mice was lower. Only Iso + PE-treated +/+ mice showed induction of NAB-1, GATA-4, and Nkx2.5. Foci of fibrosis were found in Iso + PE-treated -/- and +/+ mice. Surprisingly, vehicle-treated -/- mice displayed fibrosis and increased Sp1, skeletal actin, Nkx2.5, and GATA-4 expression without hypertrophy. Minipump removal caused the agonist-treated hearts and gene expression to regress to control or near-control levels. Thus Egr-1 deficiency caused a blunted catecholamine-induced hypertrophy response and increased sensitivity to stress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologySame topicCardiac Fibrosis and RemodelingFrench-language works237,207