Effects of inactivation‐resistant agonists on the signalling, desensitization and down‐regulation of bradykinin B<sub>2</sub>receptors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A peptide bradykinin (BK) B(2) receptor agonist partially resistant to degradation, B-9972, down-regulates this receptor subtype. We have used another recently described non-peptide agonist, compound 47a, as a tool to study further the effects of metabolically more stable and thus persistent, agonists of the BK B(2) receptor on signalling, desensitization and down-regulation of this receptor. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH AND KEY RESULTS: Compound 47a was a partial agonist at the B(2) receptor in the human umbilical vein, where it shared with B-9972 a very slow relaxation on washout, and in HEK 293 cell lines expressing tagged forms [myc, green fluorescent protein (GFP)] of the rabbit B(2) receptor. Compound 47a desensitized the umbilical vein to BK. In the cellular systems, the inactivation-resistant agonists induced [Ca(2+)](i) transients as brief as those of BK but affected other functions with a longer duration than BK [12 h; receptor endocytosis, endosomal beta-arrestin(1/2) translocation, protein kinase C-dependent extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK)1/2 phosphorylation and c-Fos expression]. The B(2) receptor-GFP was degraded in cells exposed to B-9972 or compound 47a for 12 h. The non-peptide B(2) receptor antagonist LF 16-0687 prevented all effects of compound 47a, which were also absent in cells lacking recombinant B(2) receptors. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Inactivation-resistant agonists revealed a long-lasting assembly of the agonist-B(2) receptor-beta-arrestin complexes in endosomal structures and induce 'biased signalling' (in terms of activation of ERK and c-Fos) as a function of time. Further, B-9972 and compound 47a, unlike BK, efficiently down-regulated BK B(2) receptors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".