MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2106830333 · doi:10.1139/e05-040

Genesis of the Olden wollastonite skarn, Sharbot Lake domain, Central Metasedimentary Belt, Grenville Province, southeastern Ontario, Canada

2005· article· en· W2106830333 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Tassos Grammatikopoulos, Alan H. Clark, T. H. Pearce, Douglas Archibald

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistrySkarnHornblendePyroxeneGabbroDioriteMetamorphic rockPlutonZirconMetamorphismMagmaIgneous rockOlivineBiotiteHydrothermal circulationQuartzFluid inclusions

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With a resource of ∼2.8 Mt at 30%–35% wollastonite occurring at a depth of about 75 m, the Olden (formerly Hawley) prospect is the largest of a swarm of skarns hosted by amphibolite facies, dominantly calcitic marble that occurs adjacent to and as inliers within the Mountain Grove pluton. The post-kinematic intrusion comprises units with a wide compositional range from anorthositic gabbro to alkali-feldspar granite and syenite and widely exhibits megascopic fabrics recording magma comingling and mixing. Isotope dilution – thermal ionization mass spectrometry (ID–TIMS) dating of zircon separates from a hornblende diorite unit yields a 207Pb–206Pb age of 1153 ± 2 Ma, significantly older than the contiguous 1070 ± 3 Ma McLean granite. Al-in-hornblende geobarometry on several Mountain Grove units indicates that the intrusion crystallized at pressures of 250–470 MPa, equivalent to mesozonal depths of 10–15 km. The main exoskarn body, ∼200 m long and up to 50 m wide, is dominated by wollastonite, clinopyroxene (Di73–94Hd2–19), and calcic garnet (Gr52–83And12–37) and ranges from massive to podiform. The eastern termination exhibits rhythmically alternating wollastonite- and calcite-rich layers, 10 cm wide and locally with chevron-shaped crenulations. These layers bear no relationship to bedding or metamorphic foliation and are interpreted as “wrigglitic,” i.e., they are a record of a metasomatic front that migrated. Veins of garnet–pyroxene–vesuvianite cut the main exoskarn. Retrograde phlogopite-rich skarns, with erratic serpentine and brucite, contain variable sphalerite and pyrite. Restricted pyroxene–garnet (–wollastonite–scapolite) endoskarn is developed in intrusive rocks contiguous with the exoskarn. Skarn development is ascribed to H2O-rich (XCO2 < 0.3) magmatogene brines and high temperatures (T = 500–650 °C), which caused intense Si, Al, and Fe metasomatism of the marbles, hydrothermal activity taking place at considerable depth. The occurrence of wollastonite around the periphery of the small Long Lake sphalerite deposit, restricted to a marble roof pendant in the Mountain Grove pluton 2.1 km east-northeast of the Olden prospect, indicates that this base-metal mineralization may be an exoskarn, rather than metamorphosed Mississippi Valley type. Incremental-heating 40Ar–39Ar dating of hornblende and biotite from the Mountain Grove diorite yields plateau ages of 1058 ± 14 and 1047 ± 4 Ma, respectively, and an exoskarn phlogopite age of 1074 ± 5 Ma. A genetic relationship between hydrothermal activity and the McLean pluton cannot be ruled out, but a parental role for the older Mountain Grove pluton is favoured on the basis of the close areal relationships of skarn bodies and that intrusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.158
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences→Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→