Three‐frequency RF coil designed for optimized imaging of hyperpolarized, <sup>13</sup>C‐labeled compounds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Imaging exams involving hyperpolarized, (13)C-labeled compounds require novel RF coils for efficient signal utilization. While (13)C coils are required for mapping the spatial distribution of the hyperpolarized compounds, imaging/pulsing at different frequencies is also needed for scan setup steps prior to the image acquisition. Imaging/pulsing at the (1)H frequency is typically used for anatomical localization and shimming. Flip angle (FA) calibration, which is difficult or impossible to achieve at the (13)C frequency, can be accurately performed at the (23)Na frequency using the natural abundance signal that exists in any living tissue. We demonstrate here a single RF resonant structure that is capable of operating linearly at the (1)H and (23)Na frequencies for scan setup steps, and in quadrature at the (13)C frequency for imaging. Images at the three resonant frequencies of this coil are presented from an exam involving hyperpolarized (13)C compounds in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".