MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106854977

Private Governance in the Global Agro-Food System A Framework for Analysis

2008· article· en· W2106854977 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Doris Fuchs, Agni Kalfagianni, Jennifer A. Clapp (University of Waterloo)

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStuttgartPhoneLibrary sciencePoliticsPolitical scienceSociologyHumanitiesArtLawPhilosophyComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Doris Fuchs Agni Kalfagianni Jennifer Clapp Institute for Political Sciences Dept. of International Relations Faculty of Westfalian-Wilhems and European Integration Environmental Sciences University of Munster University of Stuttgart University of Waterloo Scharnhorststr. 100 Breitscheidstr. 2 200 University Ave. West 48151 Munster 70174 Stuttgart Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1 Germany Germany Canada doris.fuchs@uni-muenster.de agni.kalfagianni@sowi.uni-stuttgart.de jclapp@fes.waterloo.ca Phone: + 49 251 8325326 Phone: + 49 711 6858 3420 Phone: +1 519-888-4567

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.010
Science and technology studies0.0180.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0110.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocial Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)Same topicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207