SEC: Stochastic Ensemble Consensus Approach to Unsupervised SAR Sea-Ice Segmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) has become an integral part of sea-ice monitoring and analysis in the polar regions. An important task in sea-ice analysis is to segment SAR sea-ice imagery based on the underlying ice type, which is a challenging task to perform automatically due to various imaging and environmental conditions. A novel stochastic ensemble consensus approach to sea-ice segmentation (SEC) is presented to tackle this challenging task. In SEC, each pixel in the SAR sea-ice image is assigned an initial sub-class based on its tonal characteristics. Ensembles of random samples are generated from a random field representing the SAR sea-ice imagery. The generated ensembles are then used to re-estimate the sub-class of the pixels using a weighted median consensus strategy. Based on the probability distribution of the sub-classes, an expectation maximization (EM) approach is utilized to estimate the final class likelihoods using a Gaussian mixture model (GMM). Finally, maximum likelihood (ML) classification is performed to estimate the final class of each pixel within the SAR sea-ice imagery based on the estimated GMM and the assigned sub-classes. SEC was tested using a variety of operational RADARSAT-1 and RADARSAT-2 SAR sea-ice imagery provided by the Canadian Ice Service (CIS) and was shown to produce successfully segmentation results that were superior to approaches based on K-means clustering, Gamma mixture models, and Markov Random Field (MRF) models for sea-ice segmentation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".