MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106875238 · doi:10.7202/1008685ar

Le district technologique de l’automobile en Piémont

2012· article· fr· W2106875238 on OpenAlex
Ronny Bianchi, Aldo Enrietti

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale P M E Économie et gestion de la petite et moyenne entreprise · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPost-Communist Economic and Political Transition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’objectif de l’article est d’évaluer les conséquences du nouveau modèle productif adopté par Fiat au début des années 1990 sur les entreprises de sous-traitance dans la région du Piémont. Le passage du fordisme à un nouveau modèle de production a comporté un changement de taille aussi bien pour Fiat que pour toutes les entreprises qui entretenaient des relations avec elle. Le résultat n’a pas été dramatique ; au contraire, le nouveau modèle semble avoir mis en évidence des capacités d’organisation et de production qui auparavant n’étaient pas complètement exploitées. Ce qu’on a identifié comme le passage d’une aire de production de l’automobile à un district technologique de l’automobile a été possible grâce à la présence d’un mésosystème de production qui a favorisé le développement de connaissances horizontales à l’intérieur de la région.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it