MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106877775 · doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2012.0573

Fuzzy security constraints for unit commitment with outages

2013· article· en· W2106877775 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Generation Transmission & Distribution · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Power System Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower system simulationFuzzy logicInteger programmingComputer scienceMathematical optimizationScheduleElectric power systemLinear programmingElectric power transmissionTransmission linePower (physics)Reliability engineeringEngineeringAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transmission systems of power systems face risk of emergency transmission contingency and line outages. Proper optimisation tools are required to schedule generation during emergency conditions and to be able to study the effect of the transmission line outages. This study proposes a successive mixed integer linear programming (MILP) method with fuzzy security constraints for solving the AC Security Constrained Unit Commitment (AC‐SCUC) challenge with transmission line outages. A linear formulation of AC‐SCUC challenge is created resulting in an MILP model. This MILP model is transformed into a robust fuzzy MILP model that overcomes infeasibility arising from line outages. This fuzzy MILP model is set up and solved successively using MILP technique whereas updating both continuous and integer variables making the proposed algorithm efficient. The proposed method is tested on 6‐bus, IEEE 57‐bus, and IEEE 118‐bus systems to demonstrate its capabilities and benefits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.713

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it