Les représentations que se font les enseignants du primaire de la dimension culturelle du curriculum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article rend compte des représentations que se font les enseignants du primaire de la dimension culturelle du curriculum, sous l’angle de leur compréhension de la culture et celui des manières de l’intégrer, telles qu’elles se dégagent de données d’une enquête menée au printemps 2000. L’analyse révèle une compréhension diversifiée et bipolarisée de la culture; le rejet d’une conception élitiste, l’importance accordée à la culture immédiate de l’élève et à l’ouverture au monde témoignent d’un souci de rendre la culture accessible à tous. Les manières d’intégrer la dimension culturelle sont également variées, mais relèvent essentiellement de contenus à véhiculer plutôt que de stratégies d’enseignement, et comme soutien aux apprentissages plutôt que comme éléments du programme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".