Ifosfamide nephrotoxicity in children: a mechanistic base for pharmacological prevention
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The antineoplastic drug ifosfamide (IFO) in the treatment of solid tumors, particularly in children, is the cause of severe nephrotoxicity. Although it is a potent and effective chemotherapeutic agent, the associated nephrotoxicity has a serious impact on the health and the quality of life of exposed children. The toxic metabolite of IFO thought to be responsible for IFO-induced kidney damage is chloroacetaldehyde (CAA). Those suffering from nephrotoxicity typically develop tubular and glomerular toxicities, with the most severe form being Fanconi's syndrome. As the mode of toxicity of CAA seems to be primarily owing to oxidative stress, the use of antioxidants as a protective measure for the kidneys is a promising strategy. In this review, we highlight recent research that supports the local renal production of CAA as the proximate cause of IFO-induced nephrotoxicity with age as an important risk factor, those under the age of three being the most vulnerable. Most importantly, we focus on the potential advantages of the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine owing to both its antioxidant properties and its current use clinically in pediatrics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".