Soil behavior during freezing and thawing using variable and constant confining pressure triaxial tests
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although variable confining pressure (VCP) triaxial tests are generally preferred to constant confining pressure (CCP) triaxial tests due to the more realistic stress application, VCP tests have never been utilized when investigating freezethaw effects on unbound road materials. In this study, three soils were investigated for resilient behavior during freezing and thawing utilizing both VCP and CCP triaxial testing. The soils were tested at selected temperatures between +20 and 10°C during one full freezethaw cycle. The results were analyzed in terms of the traditionally used resilient modulus and Poisson's ratio, as well as volumetric and shear components, and indicate a significant difference in moduli computed from CCP and VCP data. However, resilient moduli display compatible values when interpreted in terms of mean values of deviator stress and mean normal stress. With regard to freezevthaw effects on resilient moduli, the results are inconsistent with previous findings. However, this can be explained by the different test conditions applied.Key words: freezethaw, triaxial tests, unbound pavement materials, subgrade soils, resilient modulus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".