MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106911118 · doi:10.1109/mwsym.2003.1210909

Neuro-Space Mapping technique for nonlinear device modeling and large signal simulation

2003· article· en· W2106911118 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThin-Film Transistor Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpace mappingMESFETComputer scienceNonlinear systemHarmonic balanceSIGNAL (programming language)Artificial neural networkElectronic engineeringSpace (punctuation)VoltageArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmTransistorEngineeringElectrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new Neuro-Space Mapping (Neuro-SM) approach is presented enabling the space mapping (SM) concept to be applied to nonlinear device modeling and large signal circuit simulation. Suppose that an existing device model (namely, the coarse model) cannot match the actual device behavior (namely, the fine model). Using the proposed technique, the voltage and current signals between the coarse and the fine device models are mapped by a neural network. This mapping automatically modifies the behavior of the coarse model such that the mapped model accurately matches the actual device behavior. New training methods for such mapping neural networks are proposed. Examples of SiGe HBT and GaAs MESFET modeling and use of the models in harmonic balance simulation demonstrate that Neuro-SM is a systematic method to allow us to exceed the present capabilities of the existing device models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.769
Threshold uncertainty score0.547

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicThin-Film Transistor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207