MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106952473 · doi:10.1109/robot.1994.350921

RBF network architecture for motion planning and attitude stabilization of nonholonomic spacecraft/manipulator systems

2002· article· en· W2106952473 on OpenAlexaff
Dimitry Gorinevsky, A. Kapitanovsky, A.A. Goldenberg

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonholonomic systemControl theory (sociology)Multivariable calculusComputer scienceMotion planningSpacecraftCompensation (psychology)Nonlinear systemAttitude controlControl engineeringMotion (physics)Class (philosophy)Controller (irrigation)Radial basis functionArtificial neural networkControl (management)Artificial intelligenceRobotEngineeringMobile robotAerospace engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a technique for planning and stabilization of motion in a class of multivariable nonlinear (nonholonomic) systems, and apply this technique to the free-flying manipulators. The controller architecture designed in the paper is based on the radial basis function (RBF) network approximation of an optimal control program for any desired motion. An additional control level for sampled feedback compensation of the approximation errors is also proposed. The presented RBF-based control technique overcomes certain problems associated with other control approaches recently proposed for nonholonomic systems. An example and numerical simulations are provided for illustration.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score0.498

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207