High-resolution Immunocytochemistry of Noncollagenous Matrix Proteins in Rat Mandibles Processed with Microwave Irradiation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mineral phase in calcified tissues represents an additional factor to be considered during their preservation for ultrastructural analyses. Microwave (MW) irradiation has been shown to facilitate fixative penetration and to improve structural preservation and immunolabeling in a variety of soft tissues. The aim of the present study was to determine whether MW processing could offer similar advantages for hard tissues. Rat hemimandibles were immersed in 4% formaldehyde + 0.1% glutaraldehyde buffered with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, pH 7.2, and exposed to MWs for three periods of 5 min at temperatures not exceeding 37C. They were then decalcified in 4.13% EDTA, pH 7.2, for 15 hr, also under MW irradiation. Osmicated and non-osmicated samples were dehydrated in graded concentrations of ethanol and embedded in LR White resin. Sections of incisor, molars, and alveolar bone were processed for postembedding colloidal gold immunolabeling using antibodies against ameloblastin, amelogenin, bone sialoprotein, or osteopontin. Ultrastructural preservation of tissues was in most cases comparable to that obtained by perfusion-fixation, and there was no difference in distribution of labeling with those previously reported for the antibodies used. However, the immunoreactivities obtained were generally more intense, particularly at early stages of tooth formation. Amelogenin was abundant between differentiating ameloblasts and labeling for osteopontin appeared over the Golgi apparatus of odontoblasts after initiation of dentine mineralization. We conclude that MW irradiation represents a simple method that can accelerate the processing of calcified tissues while yielding good structural preservation and antigen retention. (J Histochem Cytochem 49:1099-1109, 2001)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it