Decorrelating the Structure and Texture Components of a Variational Decomposition Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The observation has been made by Aujol and Gilboa that the cartoon and texture components of the decomposition of an image should not be correlated, as they are generated from independent processes. They use this observation in order to choose an optimal fidelity parameter lambda for the decomposition process. However, this determination can be quite inefficient since a wide range of parameters lambda must be searched through before an estimated optimal parameter can be found. In the present paper, we take a different approach, in which the cartoon and texture components are explicitly decorrelated by adding a decorrelation term to the energy functional of the decomposition model of Osher, SolE, and Vese (the OSV model). Decomposition results of improved quality over those from the OSV model are obtained, as quantified by a series of new decomposition quality measures, with cartoon and texture information better separated into their respective components. A new derivation of the OSV model is developed which maintains the texture subcomponents g(1) and g(2) so that discrimination results similar to those from other decomposition models (e.g., from the model of Vese and Osher and Improved Edge Segregation) may be obtained. This derivation is extended to the proposed model, for which discrimination results are obtained in a substantially smaller number of iterations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".