L’Arctique en péril : vers une remise en question des enjeux de souveraineté dans le Grand Nord
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El fin de la guerra fría provocó un cambio de rumbo en la manera de concebir la seguridad y la soberanía. En los años noventa del siglo pasado, las principales amenazas fueron de naturaleza asimétrica, lo que representa un desafío particular a nuestra comprensión de ese nuevo entorno internacional. La seguridad en el Ártico canadiense, con frecuencia considerada vinculada con la amenaza a la soberanía, ilustra muy bien esas recientes consideraciones en el ámbito de las relaciones internacionales. ¿Está preparado Canadá para enfrentar los nuevos retos en materia de seguridad y hacer valer su soberanía en el llamado Gran Norte? Retomamos la pregunta evaluando los riesgos tocantes a la seguridad de Canadá, considerando las capacidades actuales, así como los medios para ponerlas en práctica. Por último, proponemos un enfoque que trascienda la solución militar, lo que nos permitirá tomar en cuenta las múltiples implicaciones del caso.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".