Numerical investigation of laminar jet arrays impinging onto dimpled target surface
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The flow and heat transfer of three-by-eight laminar jet arrays impinging onto a dimpled surface with Reynolds number 100 in steady state have been investigated numerically in the present study. Grid independence was confirmed and good agreement was reached through comparison between the results obtained from the literature and the present work. The effect of jet-to-plate spacing (H/d = 1–10) dimple diameter (D d /d = 2–4) and the dimple relative depth (δ/D d = 0.10–0.30) on the flow and heat transfer characteristics of laminar impinging jet arrays was explored numerically. The average Nusselt number decreases with increasing jet-to-plate spacing, dimple relative depth, and dimple diameter. The jet flow in the downstream jets is deflected by crossflow, which makes low-velocity fluid appear in the corresponding dimples and the area is enlarged. Thus, the presence of dimples causes overall heat transfer deterioration in the laminar impinging jet arrays.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".