Analysis of transient fluid slosh in partly-filled tanks with and without baffles: Part 2 – role of baffles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Baffles tend to suppress the forces and moments caused by fluid slosh in partly filled tank trucks, thus increasing their directional stability limits. The anti-slosh properties of different baffles designs are investigated through transient slosh analysis of a partly-filled 'Reuleaux triangle' cross-section tank. The effectiveness of baffles is evaluated in terms of fundamental slosh frequency, and forces and moments. The results show that the slosh natural frequencies and magnitudes of slosh forces and moments strongly depend upon the baffle design, fill volume and excitation. The longitudinal mode frequency of the baffled tank can be three times that of the unbaffled tank, while baffles could reduce peak longitudinal force by 39%. The partial baffles could be more effective under higher fill levels. Variations in baffle porosity resulted in only minor changes in peak longitudinal slosh force, but significant effect on steady-state pitch moment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it