The impact of murine strain and sex on postnatal development after maternal dietary restriction during pregnancy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to characterize offspring responses to maternal dietary restriction (DR) in two phylogenetically distant strains of mice: A/J and C57BL/6J (B6). Pregnant mice were fed 100% or 70% of ad libitum between 6.5 and 17.5 days (d) gestation. Offspring were fed 100% ad libitum postweaning. All comparisons were made to strain and sex matched controls. Male DR-B6 offspring initially grew slower than controls; however, by 77 d and 182 d they were significantly heavier (P<0.05). Further, they had an increase percentage fat mass (+70%, P<0.01) by 182 d and were glucose intolerant at both 80 d (P<0.001) and 186 d (P<0.05). In contrast, weight, %Fat mass and glucose tolerance in DR-A/J males during postnatal life were not different from controls. Female DR-B6 mice showed catch-up growth during the first 77 d of life; however, their weight, %Fat mass and glucose tolerance were not different from controls at 80 d and 186 d. Although female DR-A/J were heavier than controls at 182 d (P<0.05), their %Fat mass and glucose tolerance were not different from controls at 182 d and 186 d. The observed strain and sex differences offer a unique opportunity to begin to define gene-environment interactions that contribute to developmental origins of health and disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".