Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article s’inscrit dans le cadre des récentes entreprises intellectuelles qui réfléchissent sur les nouveaux rapports entre l’Orient et l’Occident en examinant le vocabulaire de la mondialisation. Les essais de la sociologue marocaine Fatima Mernissi dessinent en creux les enjeux de ces rapports en posant le concept de barbarie dans le contexte de ce qu’on appelle aujourd’hui les « cultures de l’échange ». Le questionnement de la barbarie est lié à l’interrogation de la transmission du savoir par les experts masculins de la littérature religieuse islamique. L’historicité fait surgir le problème de la radicalité moderne des idéologies. Pour contrer les crispations et les dérapages qui découlent de la lecture univoque (la lecture intégriste), Mernissi propose une féminisation humaniste du savoir sur l’islam selon des procédés herméneutiques qui déconstruisent le savoir hérité. Si la barbarie est dans la transmission, la civilisation réside dans la démocratisation de la lecture du savoir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".