MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Manifestation of Derridian Différance in Shakespeare’s Hamlet

2012· article· en· W2107083880 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ali Poordaryaie Nejad, Mostafa Mirzaei, Mohammad Bagher Shabani

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHAMLET (protein complex)PhilosophyPostmodernismArtHumanitiesTragedy (event)Context (archaeology)LiteratureHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

William Shakespeare’s renowned tragedy Hamlet has ascertained itself as a touchstone for students and scholars of English literature. Extrapolating on this play, T.S. Eliot once remarked that, it is the Mona Lisa of Renaissance literature. Like Da Vinci’s painting, Hamlet (the play or the man) is a faulty or flawed work of art. Foregrounding such a literary hypothesis in mind, the present article attempts to clarify that the play’s fault, as claimed by Eliot, is not uprooted in the modern rules of decorum, construction or a reproach against image of a psychic or unaesthetic antagonist, but it is, we believe, in the postmodern concept of Differance which has been so infl uential in the assessment of literature and its values - simply articulated as the dualistic chemistry of objectifying a subjective emotion. The term Differance as a pre-postmodern quality implanted in this play, now seem to have been anachronic for the literary context of the second half of the Renaissance period. However this provides a background for Derridian term Differance which calls upon the innovative perception that differs the common perception about Hamlet. Key words: Hamlet ; Flaw; Impersonalize; Dualism; Differance Resume Le fameux tragedie de Hamlet de William Shakespeare est constate lui-meme comme une pierre de touche pour les etudiants et les universitaires de la litterature anglaise. En extrapolant sur ce jeu, Eliot T.S. a deja fait remarquer que, c’est la Mona Lisa de la litterature de la Renaissance. Comme la peinture de Leonard de Vinci, Le Hamlet (le jeu ou l’homme) est un travail defectueux ou imparfait de l’art. En mettant en avant une telle hypothese litteraire a l’esprit, le present article tente de clarifi er que la faute de la piece, selon Eliot, n’est pas deracines dans les regles modernes de la bienseance, la construction ou un reproche a l’image d'un antagoniste psychique ou inesthetique, mais il est , nous croyons, dans le concept postmoderne de la differance qui a eu une telle infl uence dans l’evaluation de la litterature et de ses valeurs, vous n’avez qu’a articule que la chimie dualiste d’objectiver une emotion subjective. La differance terme comme une qualite pre-post-moderne implante dans cette piece, semblent maintenant avoir ete anachronique dans le contexte litteraire de la seconde moitie de la periode de la Renaissance. Cependant, cette offre un arriere-plan pour differance derridienne terme qui fait appel a la perception novatrice qui differe de la perception commune a propos de Hamlet. Mots cles : Hamlet ; Defauts; Impersonalize; Dualisme; Differance

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score0.938

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicLiterary Theory and Cultural HermeneuticsFrench-language works237,207