Cardiovascular Actions of Orexin‐A in the Rat Subfornical Organ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Orexin-A is a neuropeptide, primarily produced in the lateral hypothalamic/perifornical hypothalamus. Orexin receptors and immunoreactive neuronal fibres are widely distributed throughout the brain, suggesting integrative neurotransmitter roles in a variety of physiological systems. Intracerebroventricular injections of orexin-A increase blood pressure and stimulate drinking, and the subfornical organ (SFO), a circumventricular structure implicated in autonomic control, is a potential site at which orexin may act to exert these effects. We have therefore used microinjection techniques to examine the effects of orexin-A administered directly into the SFO on blood pressure and heart rate in urethane anaesthetised male Sprague-Dawley rats. Orexin-A microinjection (50 fmol) into the SFO caused site-specific decreases in blood pressure (SFO: mean area under curve (AUC) = -681.7 +/- 46.8 mmHg*s, n = 22 versus non-SFO: 63.68 +/- 54.69 mmHg*s, n = 15, P < 0.001), and heart rate (SFO: mean AUC = -26.7 +/- 2.8 beats, n = 22, versus non-SFO: mean AUC = 1.62 +/- 2.1 beats, n = 15, P < 0.001). Vagotomy did not alter the hypotensive or bradycardic responses elicited by orexin-A microinjection. Prior alpha-adrenoceptor blockade with phenoxybenzamine (1 mg/kg, i.v.) masked the orexin-A induced blood pressure (mean AUC = -122.6 +/- 17.6 mmHg*s, n = 4, P < 0.01 paired t-test) and heart rate (mean AUC = -6.7 +/- 1.7 beats, n = 4, P < 0.05, paired test) response. The orexin-A induced heart rate response was attenuated when beta-adrenoceptors were blocked with propranolol (1 mg/kg, i.v.; mean AUC = 0.6 +/- 2.8 beats, n = 5, P < 0.01 paired t-test). These studies demonstrate that microinjection of orexin-A into the SFO causes site specific decreases in blood pressure and heart rate which is mediated by a reduction in sympathetic tone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".