MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107109865 · doi:10.1517/14656566.8.9.1221

Latest medical treatment strategies for venous thromboembolism

2007· review· en· W2107109865 on OpenAlexaff
Simon McRae, John W. Eikelboom

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFondaparinuxWarfarinIntensive care medicineHeparinAnticoagulantLow molecular weight heparinThrombosisVenous thromboembolismCoagulation cascadeThrombusDiscovery and development of direct thrombin inhibitorsBivalirudinSurgeryInternal medicineThrombinMyocardial infarctionPlateletAtrial fibrillationPercutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anticoagulant therapy with unfractionated heparin (UFH) followed by warfarin prevents thrombus extension, reduces the risk of recurrent thrombosis and prevents death in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) has replaced UFH as the preferred initial anticoagulant therapy for VTE because it is as effective and safe as UFH, but does not require laboratory monitoring and is less likely to cause immune thrombocytopenia and osteoporosis. More recently, fondaparinux has been shown to be an effective and safe alternative to LMWH and several new parenteral anticoagulants are being evaluated. The most important unmet need in the anticoagulant management of VTE is a replacement for warfarin. New oral anticoagulants that selectively target individual steps in the coagulation cascade have been shown to be effective for the long-term treatment of VTE in Phase II and III trials and are likely to become available in the near future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.192
GPT teacher head0.513
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on PharmacotherapySame topicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementFrench-language works237,207