Quand la conquête de la citoyenneté renverse le cycle de la stigmatisation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La psychiatrie moderne est a un tournant de son histoire ou les usagers prennent une place croissante dans les services de sante mentale. Dans le cadre du Centre collaborateur de l’OMS (Lille, France) pour la recherche et la formation en sante mentale, une recherche-action est menee depuis 3 ans integrant des usagers en tant qu’experts d’experience. A travers de nombreux temoignages d’usagers, d’une formation sur la resilience et de decouverte experiences novatrices en Europe et au Canada, le groupe de recherche a elabore de nouveaux concepts et mis en place plusieurs actions allant dans le sens d’une reconquete de la citoyennete. Trois etapes ont ete decrites aux niveaux individuel, groupal et societal pour enrayer a chaque niveau le cycle de la stigmatisation et entrer dans la dynamique du retablissement. La perspective de la creation en France d’un statut de pairs-aidants est une des illustrations de la reconnaissance possible de l’expertise specifique des usagers a partir de leurs experiences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.042 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.015 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".