MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107125071 · doi:10.1109/pes.2009.5275844

Large-scale transient stability simulation on graphics processing units

2009· article· en· W2107125071 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceGraphicsCentral processing unitAccelerationGraphics processing unitComputationTransient (computer programming)Massively parallelCUDAGeneral-purpose computing on graphics processing unitsCoprocessorComputational scienceParallel computingSoftwareComputer graphics (images)Computer hardwareAlgorithmOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Graphics processing units (GPUs) have recently attracted a lot of interest in several fields struggling with massively large computation tasks. The application of a GPU for fast and accurate transient stability simulation of the large-scale power systems is presented in this paper. The computationally intensive parts of the simulation were offloaded to the GPU to co-operate with the CPU. As such, a hybrid GPU-CPU simulator is configured. The accuracy of the proposed simulation approach has been validated by using the PSS/E software. The computation time of the simulation performed by co-processing of GPU-CPU has been compared with that of the CPU-only simulation. Several test cases have been used to demonstrate the significant acceleration of the GPU-CPU simulation. A speed-up of 345 is reported for a 320 generator and 1248 bus power system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.783
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207