MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modulation of Protective Immunity, Eosinophilia, and Cytokine Responses by Selective Mutagenesis of a Recombinant G Protein Vaccine against Respiratory Syncytial Virus

2005· article· en· W2107127801 on OpenAlexafffund
Yan Huang, Robert Anderson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Virology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchDalhousie UniversityNova Scotia Health Research FoundationDalhousie Medical Research Foundation
KeywordsBiologyVirologyVirusNeutralizing antibodyPulmonary EosinophiliaImmunogenicityAntibodyRecombinant DNAImmunityMicrobiologyImmunologyImmune systemGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using an Escherichia coli-grown plasmid vector encoding a fragment of thioredoxin (Trx) fused to a central region (amino acids 128 to 229) of the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) (Long strain) G protein, we employed site-directed mutagenesis to investigate the importance of selected amino acids to vaccine efficacy. Mice were immunized with a total of 10 wild-type or mutant Trx-G proteins and challenged intranasally with RSV. Striking differences in the induction of RSV G-protein-specific antibodies, protection against RSV challenge, cytokine RNA responses, and induction of RSV-associated eosinophilic inflammation were observed among the mutant proteins examined. Taken together, the results identify a critical role for specific amino acids in the induction of protective immunity and priming for eosinophilia against RSV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of VirologySame topicRespiratory viral infections researchFrench-language works237,207