Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce travail vise à souligner l’impact des chablis sur la pédogénèse et à contribuer ainsi à une meilleure interprétation des données pédologiques dont les datations au radiocarbone. Les effets de ce phénomène sont illustrés au moyen de coupes de sol pratiquées sous l’érablière à bouleau jaune. Les résultats de la datation de la matière organique de trois échantillons de sol, prélevés à environ 1 à 2 m les uns des autres dans la partie supérieure de l’horizon B, indiquent des âges apparents variant de 1260 années BP à 2430 années BP. Cette discontinuité dans les âges obtenus confirme l’énoncé de BROWN (1977), à savoir que l’âge des sols forestiers varie beaucoup entre des points très rapprochés à la suite du rajeunissement continuel du sol sous forêt par le chablis. Il devient donc important de bien considérer ce dernier phénomène dans l’interprétation des datations au radiocarbone, que ce soit pour des études pédogénétiques ou paléo-pédologiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".