Pattern formation in a mean field model of electrocortical activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mean field models of cortical activity describe the electrical potentials and interactions of cortical neuron populations, coarse-grained over the scale of a few macro columns. Such models can be analysed as dynamical systems, in particular as time-dependent partial differential or integro-differential equations, which may have complicating aspects such as explicit time delays and stochastic terms. We analyse a model of intermediate complexity, formulated by Liley et al. [1]. This model describes an excitatory and an inhibitory population in a simple geometry, on which the effect of long-range connections is represented by a damped wave equations. Although somewhat rudimentary from a physiological point of view, this model has been shown to predict several features of electrocortical dynamics rather well (see, e.g., [2,3] and refs therein) and is challenging to analyse mathematically. It consists of fourteen coupled partial differential equations with strong nonlinearities. Where previous analysis on this model, and similar mean-field models, has used drastic simplifications, such as reduction to zero or one spatial dimensions or a single population, we developed tools for parsing the dynamics of the full-fledged equations [4]. Using the open-source library PETSc [5], we have implemented fully implicit time-stepping for the field equations and the tangent linear model, as well as arclength continuation for equilibrium and time-periodic solutions. All computations are performed in parallel using domain decomposition. In the current application of these tools, we focus on physiologically interesting γ-range activity [3]. This activity is triggered by a Hopf bifurcation under small variations of the local inhibitory to inhibitory connection density. We computed the saddle-type periodic orbit that regulates the transient dynamics of perturbations to the base equilibrium state. Two snap shots of this orbit, computed on a 12.8 by 12.8 cm domain, with 0.5 mm resolution, are shown in Figure Figure1.1. The period of this orbit corresponds to a 12 Hz oscillation, whereas the final, attracting, state has a strong 40 Hz peak in the power spectrum [3]. Figure 1 Partial bifurcation diagram near the primary instability, which is a subcritical Hopf bifurcation. In ongoing work we are investigating bifurcations of this periodic orbit, which can turn completely stable or give rise to more complicated solutions, such as quasi-periodic or chaotic. This dynamical systems approach to the analysis of mean-field models should give us more insight in the complex model behaviour. Figure 2 Two snap shots of the excitatory membrane potential along the saddle periodic orbit. The potential ranges from -67 mV (dark red) to -52 mV (dark blue).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".