Fumarylacetoacetate, the metabolite accumulating in hereditary tyrosinemia, activates the ERK pathway and induces mitotic abnormalities and genomic instability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Patients suffering from the metabolic disease hereditary tyrosinemia type I (HT1), caused by fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase deficiency, have a high risk of developing liver cancer. We report that a sub-apoptogenic dose of fumarylacetoacetate (FAA), the mutagenic metabolite accumulating in HT1, induces spindle disturbances and segregational defects in both rodent and human cells. Mitotic abnormalities, such as distorted spindles, lagging chromosomes, anaphase/telophase chromatin bridges, aberrant karyokinesis/cytokinesis and multinucleation were observed. Some mitotic asters displayed a large pericentriolar material cloud and/or altered distribution of the spindle pole-associated protein NuMA. FAA-treated cells developed micronuclei which were predominantly CREST-positive, suggesting chromosomal instability. The Golgi complex was rapidly disrupted by FAA, without evident microtubules/tubulin alterations, and a sustained activation of the extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK) was also observed. Primary skin fibroblasts derived from HT1 patients, not exogenously treated with FAA, showed similar mitotic-derived alterations and ERK activation. Biochemical data suggest that FAA causes ERK activation through a thiol-regulated and tyrosine kinase-dependent, but growth factor receptor- and protein kinase C-independent pathway. Pre-treatment with the MEK inhibitor PD98059 and the Ras farnesylation inhibitor B581 decreased the formation of CREST-positive micronuclei by approximately 75%, confirming the partial contribution of the Ras/ERK effector pathway to the induction of chromosomal instability by FAA. Replenishment of intracellular glutathione (GSH) with GSH monoethylester abolished ERK activation and reduced the chromosomal instability induced by FAA by 80%. Together these results confirm and extend the previously reported genetic instability occurring in cells from HT1 patients and allow us to speculate that this tumorigenic-related phenomenon may rely on the biochemical/cellular effects of FAA as a thiol-reacting and organelle/mitotic spindle-disturbing agent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".