Negotiating the “Global” within the Global Playscapes of Mount Everest*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En anthropologie du tourisme, les termes « touriste » et « local » sont souvent utilisés pour conceptualiser les relations sociales du tourisme international, où les sujets mobiles des « pays industrialisés » rendent visite aux « autres » du « tiers monde », non mobiles. La mondialisation, à la fois comme discours et comme condition, est en train de changer les contours et les conceptualisations des espaces touristiques. Dans cet article, l'auteure montre comment différents sujets négocient le « mondial » et comment les alpinistes récréationnels du Népal négocient leurs identités en tant que « locaux » aussi bien que sujets mondiaux, mobiles et voyageurs dans le cadre du « paysage récréationnel mondial » de l'himalayisme. Elle suggère que la question de savoir qui peut être un touriste dans un monde en voie de mondialisation devrait être examinée de très près.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".