MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2107238770 · doi:10.1029/2010ja015338

H Balmer lines in terrestrial aurora: Historical record and new observations by OSIRIS on Odin

2010· article· en· W2107238770 on OpenAlexaff
R. L. Gattinger, A. Egeland, Adam Bourassa, N. D. Lloyd, D. A. Degenstein, J. Stegman, E. J. Llewellyn

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersTekes
KeywordsBalmer seriesOsirisPhysicsSpectral lineDoppler effectDoppler broadeningPolarLine (geometry)Intensity (physics)AstrophysicsGeologyEmission spectrumOpticsAstronomyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The H Balmer emissions were first identified in terrestrial aurora by Vegard (1939). The earliest photographic spectral observations are reviewed. In the subsequent decade, the intensity ratios for Hα, Hβ, and Hγ were measured, and the well‐known line broadening and blue shift were established. Recently, the Hα, Hγ, Hδ, and Hɛ features have been measured by OSIRIS on Odin. The Balmer components are resolved from other auroral features using sets of synthetic spectra. The measured intensity ratios are in good agreement with an extensive set of published model calculations. The presented observations are in the polar region averaged over limb tangent altitudes from 100 to 105 km, approximately perpendicular to the terrestrial magnetic field lines, for this geometry showing Doppler broadening without obvious Doppler shifts. The OSIRIS‐measured full‐width at half‐height of the Hα feature is 2.2 nm corresponding to an H atom velocity of 500 km s−1 and energy approximately 1.3 keV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres→Same topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics→French-language works237,207→