Characterization of major depressive disorder using a multiparametric classification approach based on high resolution structural images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the most disabling mental illnesses. Previous neuroanatomical studies of MDD have revealed regional alterations in grey matter volume and density. However, owing to the heterogeneous symptomatology and complex etiology, MDD is likely to be associated with multiple morphometric alterations in brain structure. We sought to distinguish first-episode, medication-naive, adult patients with MDD from healthy controls and characterize neuroanatomical differences between the groups using a multiparameter classification approach. METHODS: We recruited medication-naive patients with first-episode depression and healthy controls matched for age, sex, handedness and years of education. High-resolution T1-weighted images were used to extract 7 morphometric parameters, including both volumetric and geometric features, based on the surface data of the entire cerebral cortex. These parameters were used to compare patients and controls using multivariate support vector machine, and the regions that informed the discrimination between the 2 groups were identified based on maximal classification weights. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients and 32 controls participated in the study. Both volumetric and geometric parameters could discriminate patients with MDD from healthy controls, with cortical thickness in the right hemisphere providing the greatest accuracy (78%, p ≤ 0.001). This discrimination was informed by a bilateral network comprising mainly frontal, temporal and parietal regions. LIMITATIONS: The sample size was relatively small and our results were based on first-episode, medication-naive patients. CONCLUSION: Our investigation demonstrates that multiple cortical features are affected in medication-naive patients with first-episode MDD. These findings extend the current understanding of the neuropathological underpinnings of MDD and provide preliminary support for the use of neuroanatomical scans in the early detection of MDD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".