PERKEMBANGAN EKONOMI REGIONAL DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA TRIWULAN IV-2004
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Economic performance of Yogyakarta Province in the fourth quarter of 2004 (QIV- 2004) tended to decrease slightly, as reflected by negative growth of Gross Domestic Regional Product (GDRP) of -6.92%, in line with the initial forecast. The negative growth of the regional economy was mainly attributable to the developments of three economic sectors during QIV-2004, these are (i) Agriculture sector, (ii) Finance, Ownership, and Business Service sector, (iii) Services sector. Based on GDRP negative growth of Yogyakarta Province in the past three quarters, it is predictable that the economy in the year 2004 could be able to grow at estimated rate 4,88%, which is higher than previous year economic growth. On the other hand, overall inflationary pressure in Yogyakarta City rose, indicated by quarterly inflation of Consumer Price Index (CPI) of QIV-2004 was 2.66% (quarter to quarter) and cumulative CPI inflation through December 2004 was 6.95% (year to date), higher than National CPI inflation (6.40%). The inflationary pressure particularly during QIV-2004 was driven by increased domestic demand due to a seasonal factor of religious events i.e. Idul Fitri, Christmas Eve and New Year Eve. Meanwhile, in general banking performance consisting of commercial & rural banks during QIV-2004 was relatively stable, despite of slightly decreased banks’ asset and deposits as of November 2004 which is recorded 1.00% and 1.35% respectively. In contrast, total credits grew from Rp4,699 billions (Sept’04) to Rp5,013 billions (Nov’04) as well as Non Performing Loans Ratio somewhat declined from 2.50% to 2.45.%. Keywords : economic growth, CPI inflation and banking performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".