MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107282539 · doi:10.5539/mas.v4n11p116

Rural Appropriate Technology: Using Locally Available Wires for Pre-tensioning

2010· article· en· W2107282539 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M R Wakchaure, Vishwas Pramod Kulkarni, Pravin Ranganath Mehetre

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete Corrosion and Durability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConductorUltimate tensile strengthRural areaCivil engineeringStructural engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringComposite materialPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The prices of the building materials are skyrocketing in these days in almost all developing countries, resulting in disturbing the picture of dream home from a mind of middle class rural citizens. This paper reports the results of an experimental study of the thin concrete slab panels with concrete beams pre-tensioned with locally available galvanized iron wires to prove a low cost and effective substitute for conventional pipe purlin supported GI sheet roofing system, using the concept of Rural Appropriate Technology (RAT). Wires used are up to 4mm diameter with recorded ultimate tensile stress is up to 700N/mm2. Being located tropical region the temperature variation in central India ranges from 7o to 450 which makes the conventional roofing system almost useless in summer. The proposed roofing system will help to solve this problem to a considerable extent as concrete bad conductor of heat. This system also helps in bringing down the cost of roofing, promoting the use of locally available labourer to slowdown the movement of rural people towards metros, and use local material to reduce overexploitation of natural resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicConcrete Corrosion and DurabilityFrench-language works237,207