MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107298418 · doi:10.1109/wcre.2000.891453

Constructing XML-speaking wrappers for WEB applications: towards an interoperating WEB

2002· article· en· W2107298418 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWeb Data Mining and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceInteroperationWorld Wide WebXMLEfficient XML InterchangeWeb serviceXML SignatureSOAPXML Schema EditorStreaming XMLDatabaseXPathXML validationInformation retrievalInteroperability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We discuss an architecture for integrating WWW applications that offer information and services in the same domain. At the center of this architecture exists a mediator, whose responsibilities are to interact with the user and to effectively exchange information with the underlying applications in order to accomplish the user's task. The integration and interoperation of the existing applications are based on the availability of a common domain model, explicitly represented in XML. More specifically we have developed a general method for constructing wrappers for Web-based applications, so that they exchange data with shared semantics such as defined in the XML domain model. At run-time, the user's requests result in the mediator's XML queries to the application wrappers, which, in turn, invoke appropriate methods on the wrapped applications and extract XML data from their responses to these queries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWeb Data Mining and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207