MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107317419 · doi:10.2217/dmt.12.74

Ask the Experts: Pediatric Type 1 diabetes: adjunctive therapies, celiac disease and the role of the primary care physician

2012· article· en· W2107317419 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paola De Luca, Jill Hamilton, Farid H. Mahmud, Juliet A. Usher‐Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes Management · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCeliac Disease Research and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsk pricePrimary careDiseaseIntensive care medicineType 2 diabetesDiabetes mellitusPediatricsPrimary care physicianFamily medicineInternal medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paola Luca is a clinical fellow in pediatric endocrinology and metabolism at The Hospital for Sick Children (ON, Canada). She obtained her medical degree at the University of Toronto (ON, Canada) and completed her training in pediatrics at The Hospital for Sick Children. She is currently pursuing a Master of Science through the Institute of Medicine at the University of Toronto. Her research focus is evaluating clinical outcomes of adolescents with severe obesity enrolled in the interdisciplinary weight management program at The Hospital for Sick Children. Jill Hamilton is a pediatric endocrinologist at The Hospital for Sick Children, Medical Director of the Sick Kids Team Obesity Management Program (STOMP), Senior Associate Scientist and Associate Professor of Pediatrics at the University of Toronto. Her clinical work is in endocrinology and diabetes, with a particular focus in the area of obesity. She completed her medical school training at the University of Ottawa (ON, Canada) and then trained at The ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0070.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetes ManagementSame topicCeliac Disease Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207