MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107399701 · doi:10.1109/icps.1995.526991

Short-circuit current estimation from measurements of voltage and current during disturbances

2002· article· en· W2107399701 on OpenAlexaff
K. Srinivasan, C. Lafond, R. Jutras

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurrent (fluid)Short circuitVoltageConstant power circuitPower (physics)Short circuit ratioElectronic engineeringComputer scienceNetwork analysisVolt-ampereLED circuitElectrical engineeringPower factorEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Short-circuit current is usually calculated theoretically, using power network parameters and configuration. This paper describes a method for estimating the short-circuit current using measurements taken at the distribution feeders. The method makes use of small, as well as large, disturbances. As an example, the paper includes a statistical analysis of the short-circuit current estimates from disturbance measurements in a 20-h period near a sawmill. The short-circuit current value plays an important role in the evaluation of the severity of power quality degradation at the distribution voltage levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.384

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207