MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107402345 · doi:10.1109/ssst.2010.5442847

Design of power controller for hybrid vehicle

2010· article· en· W2107402345 on OpenAlexaff
Hubert H. Chin, Ayat Jafari

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicGame Theory and Applications
Canadian institutionsNew York Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomotive engineeringController (irrigation)Computer sciencePower (physics)Hybrid powerTorqueElectric vehicleGasolineElectric motorHybrid vehiclePoint (geometry)Control theory (sociology)Control (management)EngineeringMathematicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper a new solution for the design of a control system of a hybrid vehicle is presented using game model approaches. Hybrid vehicles combined the benefits of a gasoline engine and an electric motor, which can be utilized in parallel through a mechanical transmission. Players are considered to be the electric motor and the gasoline engine. Payoff matrices of the bimatrix game are calculated by a power controller of the hybrid vehicle. The Lemke-Howson algorithm used to compute a Nash equilibrium point which is a pair of strategies for both players. The solution concept is to integrate torque for satisfying the driver pedal motion. The ratio of the power contribution between the gasoline engine and electric motor is the key point for efficient driving, whilst satisfying power demands. The main contribution of this paper is the development of a power controller which improves fuel economy and reduces charging cycles thus minimizing emissions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGame Theory and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207