Synthesis, characterization, and solid-state polymerization of cross-conjugated octatetraynes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two series of cross-conjugated 1,3,5,7-octatetraynes (1a–1l and 6a–6d) have been synthesized. UV–vis spectroscopic analysis shows that pendent groups connected to the cross-conjugated skeleton have little effect on the λ max energies, irrespective of whether the groups are electron withdrawing or donating. A number of the isolated products readily give crystals suitable for X-ray crystallography, and the solid-state structural properties of five derivatives (1k, 1l, 6a, 6c, and 6d) have been examined by X-ray crystallographic analysis. Parallel packing of the polyynes in the solid state indicates that four of the five samples are potentially suitable for topochemical polymerization, based on solid-state packing parameters θ, R, and d. Attempts to effect a solid-state reaction have been explored through UV–vis and γ-ray irradiation as well as thermal heating. The course of these reactions was monitored by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis, as well as UV–vis and solid-state 13 C NMR spectroscopy (for 1d, 1j, 1k, and 6d), which offered evidence of polymer formation from these reactions. Structural determination of the product(s), however, remains elusive.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it