MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107409513 · doi:10.1002/jcc.20109

Biased fragment distribution in MC simulation of protein folding

2004· article· en· W2107409513 on OpenAlexafffund
Éric Martineau, Pierre‐Jean L'Heureux, John R. Gunn

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational Chemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Structure and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCompute Canada
FundersUniversité de MontréalCentres de Recerca de Catalunya
KeywordsMonte Carlo methodProtein foldingFolding (DSP implementation)Statistical physicsFragment (logic)Selection (genetic algorithm)Sampling (signal processing)Computer scienceMolecular dynamicsDistribution (mathematics)ChemistryBiological systemComputational chemistryAlgorithmPhysicsMathematicsStatisticsBiologyArtificial intelligenceEngineeringBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monte Carlo (MC) methods play an important role in simulations of protein folding. These methods rely on a random sampling of moves on a potential energy surface. To improve the efficiency of the sampling, we propose a new selection of trial moves based on an empirical distribution of three-residue (triplet) conformations. This selection is compared to random combinations of the preferred conformations of the three amino acids, and it is shown that the new trial moves lead to finding structures closer to the native conformation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Computational ChemistrySame topicProtein Structure and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207