MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107463447 · doi:10.1093/ndtplus/sfp145

Colour Doppler twinkling in kidney stones: artefact or sign?

2009· article· en· W2107463447 on OpenAlexaff
Simeone Andrulli, A. Turrin, Maria Carla Bigi, Pietro Ravani, Alberto Trinchieri, Francesco Locatelli

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Kidney Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEcho (communications protocol)Sign (mathematics)Doppler effectRadiologyDoppler sonographyPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The twinkling in colour Doppler images is created by a rapidly changing series of coloured horizontal bars that appear beyond the reflex surfaces. Spectral analyses show a typically rectangular time/velocity wave diagram, and an uncomfortably high-pitched audio signal saturates the echo system. The twinkling can be detected in the calcified areas of various tissues and is usually interpreted as an artefact; however, this report describes two cases suggesting that it may be valuable for the early diagnosis and follow-up of kidney stones. This observation may have important diagnostic, epidemiological and clinical implications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Kidney JournalSame topicKidney Stones and Urolithiasis TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207