US campus and university debit card policies regarding tobacco and electronic cigarettes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A modern advancement of university student identification cards is the ability to load the card with ‘campus cash’, converting it to a debit card that can be used to purchase goods and services at various university-affiliated merchants on-campus and off-campus. Students or, more commonly, parents can load these university debit cards with money. Policies regarding the use and management of these debit cards are institution specific. Some universities allow use of campus cash at off-campus vendors while others limit the debits cards for on-campus use only, such as dining halls and convenience stores. A prior study discovered that 42% of surveyed university students used their university debit card to purchase cigarettes.1 In addition, more than one-quarter million youth who had never smoked a cigarette used electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) in 2013.2 This exploratory investigation assessed campus and university-affiliated debit card policies regarding tobacco and e-cigarettes at major American universities. The university debit card policies regarding tobacco products and e-cigarettes at the top 100 universities according …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.012 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".