MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107485686 · doi:10.1093/mollus/eyr037

Geographic distribution and molecular identification of a metapopulation of blue mussels (genus Mytilus) in northeastern New Zealand

2011· article· en· W2107485686 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan P. A. Gardner, Kristen M. Westfall

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Molluscan Studies · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersVictoria University of Wellington
KeywordsMytilusMetapopulationBiologyBlue musselEcologyFisheryBayGeographyBiological dispersalPopulationArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report here on the abundance and distribution of a metapopulation of smooth-shelled blue mussels (genus Mytilus) from northeastern New Zealand (NZ), in the latitudinal range 37–35°S. Site surveys revealed the presence of blue mussels at 12 of 20 locations on the east coast of the Northland Peninsula, in the Hauraki Gulf and into the Bay of Islands region. Additional material was collected subsequently from three sites, including an estuary location in Auckland, which is the southern-most record of blue mussels in this northern region. This new record of an extensive, but patchily distributed metapopulation in northeastern NZ identifies the existence of a pronounced geographic discontinuity between 37°S and 41°S in the distribution of Mytilus throughout NZ. Based on its geographic isolation, we suggest that the northeastern metapopulation is genetically isolated from other more southerly distributed blue mussels in NZ. Molecular identification of the mussels was carried out by both nuclear and mitochondrial DNA RFLP assays. While the majority of mussels were identified as native Southern hemisphere M. galloprovincialis, a substantial number of individuals with a nonnative (Northern hemisphere) M. galloprovincialis mitotype were also identified. The identification of this new metapopulation composed of both northern and southern lineage M. galloprovincialis has challenging biosecurity and conservation implications. Because of the pronounced geographic break in the distribution of blue mussels in NZ it may be possible to minimize further spread of the northern lineage mitotype to the rest of the country using an internal borders containment approach. However, based on introductions of (Northern hemisphere) M. galloprovincialis elsewhere in the world, we believe that the most likely outcome in NZ of this bioincursion is extensive interbreeding and introgression between the northern and southern lineages of M. galloprovincialis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.226

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Molluscan StudiesSame topicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207